<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Martial Plan?</title>
	<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/</link>
	<description>Just When You Thought it was Safe to Take Politics Seriously Again</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: richarda</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-32024</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-32024</guid>
					<description>&quot;Tricky Dick&quot; referred to Nixon, originated by his opponents in his successful 1950 California U. S. Senate campaign against Rep. Helen Gahagan Douglas (D-CA).

While Dick Tuck was renowned as a Democratic campaign 'trickster', the nick name was not applied to him, as he came along too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tricky Dick&#8221; referred to Nixon, originated by his opponents in his successful 1950 California U. S. Senate campaign against Rep. Helen Gahagan Douglas (D-CA).</p>
<p>While Dick Tuck was renowned as a Democratic campaign &#8216;trickster&#8217;, the nick name was not applied to him, as he came along too late.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-32009</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-32009</guid>
					<description>Hey, there is someone still alive that remembers &quot;tricky Dick&quot;  a.k.a. Dick Tuck.  What a really
evil person he was.  I remember him well even after 30+ years.  I believe he is still alive and blogging, I think.  He is part of the netroots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, there is someone still alive that remembers &#8220;tricky Dick&#8221;  a.k.a. Dick Tuck.  What a really<br />
evil person he was.  I remember him well even after 30+ years.  I believe he is still alive and blogging, I think.  He is part of the netroots.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31992</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31992</guid>
					<description>Cassandra here,
The above is academic hyperventilating kerfluffle all around.
It's both maddening and reaffirming to watch humanity, particularly the civilization thereof, undergoing the equivalent of a menstrual cycle as the body in its entirety prompts the flushing of both real and potential defectives.
The real TRUTH, err, is that before long, the frustration level will be raised to a point where the spastic colon types will prompt there own treatment by way of massive doses of high speed anti psychotic lead injection treatments.
The simple folk will arrive at a point where the overhead bills required to mange and care for the reality based crowd and the ever increasing stupidity they practice will come due.
Is there danger the treatment will result in the resulting conditions being worse than what was present to begin with?
To quote on well known wonk, &quot;Heh&quot;.  
The breathless brilliant really don't have time to be bothered by that reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cassandra here,<br />
The above is academic hyperventilating kerfluffle all around.<br />
It&#8217;s both maddening and reaffirming to watch humanity, particularly the civilization thereof, undergoing the equivalent of a menstrual cycle as the body in its entirety prompts the flushing of both real and potential defectives.<br />
The real TRUTH, err, is that before long, the frustration level will be raised to a point where the spastic colon types will prompt there own treatment by way of massive doses of high speed anti psychotic lead injection treatments.<br />
The simple folk will arrive at a point where the overhead bills required to mange and care for the reality based crowd and the ever increasing stupidity they practice will come due.<br />
Is there danger the treatment will result in the resulting conditions being worse than what was present to begin with?<br />
To quote on well known wonk, &#8220;Heh&#8221;.<br />
The breathless brilliant really don&#8217;t have time to be bothered by that reality.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Livermoron</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31879</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31879</guid>
					<description>You are delusional.  See a professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are delusional.  See a professional.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dougger</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31877</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31877</guid>
					<description>Livermoron -

I was not including you in &quot;us&quot;.
I was referring to &quot;all of us&quot; on the right who are not mean spirited.

There is no point.
I am just having fun.

I got my tin foil hat on and......oohhhh.... it feels soooooo goood.

Outing your ass was just a bonus.

That you did not notice that I switched to a conservative framing in my second post is truly funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Livermoron -</p>
<p>I was not including you in &#8220;us&#8221;.<br />
I was referring to &#8220;all of us&#8221; on the right who are not mean spirited.</p>
<p>There is no point.<br />
I am just having fun.</p>
<p>I got my tin foil hat on and&#8230;&#8230;oohhhh&#8230;. it feels soooooo goood.</p>
<p>Outing your ass was just a bonus.</p>
<p>That you did not notice that I switched to a conservative framing in my second post is truly funny.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31875</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31875</guid>
					<description>As far as the famous quote by Silverstien, any critical non-baised reading renders the truth:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;i&gt;
&quot;I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.&quot;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 –Larry Silverstein

Let's examine this, shall we?  

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
I doubt that the fire department commander would say something like that about a &quot;small, insubstantial fire...&quot; like you conspiracy wackjobs like to claim.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Let's be honest now and apply Occram's Razor.  What makes more sense?  DId Silverstein say 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;We’ve had such terrible loss of life that it would be wise to blow up my building&quot; 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
or was he saying 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;We’ve had such terrible loss of life that it would be wise to withdraw firefighters to prevent further loss of life&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Be honest now, we are watching...
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;...And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse...&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Who made that decision?  Look very closely.  &lt;strong&gt;&quot;They&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;.  The FDNY made the decision.  Does the FDNY demolish buildings with explosives?  No.  &quot;Pull&quot; to a fireman means to &quot;pull out&quot; of a situation too dangerous to be near.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the famous quote by Silverstien, any critical non-baised reading renders the truth:</p>
<blockquote><p>
<i><br />
&#8220;I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, &#8216;We&#8217;ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.&#8217; And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.&#8221;<br />
</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p> –Larry Silverstein</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s examine this, shall we?  </p>
<p><i>&#8220;I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire&#8221;</i><br />
I doubt that the fire department commander would say something like that about a &#8220;small, insubstantial fire&#8230;&#8221; like you conspiracy wackjobs like to claim.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;and I said, &#8216;We&#8217;ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be honest now and apply Occram&#8217;s Razor.  What makes more sense?  DId Silverstein say </p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;We’ve had such terrible loss of life that it would be wise to blow up my building&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>or was he saying </p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;We’ve had such terrible loss of life that it would be wise to withdraw firefighters to prevent further loss of life&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Be honest now, we are watching&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
<i>&#8220;&#8230;And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse&#8230;&#8221;</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Who made that decision?  Look very closely.  <strong>&#8220;They&#8221;</strong>.  The FDNY made the decision.  Does the FDNY demolish buildings with explosives?  No.  &#8220;Pull&#8221; to a fireman means to &#8220;pull out&#8221; of a situation too dangerous to be near.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31871</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31871</guid>
					<description>Dougger:

Here's a clue for you.  Silverstein used the term &quot;Pull&quot; to describe a decision made. Conspiracy theorists say &quot;Pull&quot; is a term used by demolition experts. This is one of those many half truths conspiracy theorists use to convince the ignorant. &quot;Pull&quot; is used when they &quot;Pull&quot; a building away from another with cables during demolition.  So, what brought down WTC7?  Most likely getting hit by the perimeter columns during the Tower Collapse and it's eventual conflaguration.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;i&gt;
“We had to be very careful about how we demolished building 6. We were worried about building 6 coming down and damaging the slurry walls, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area.” 

Interesting. They needed to be sure that building 6 came down in a “controlled” way. But wait a second: the video clip that Alex Jones presents – the clip that’s shown on all the conspiracist websites –ends abruptly at this point. Huh? Where’s the money shot? Why’d they cut it there?

Here’s why:

Because the very next scene scene shows how building 6 was “pulled”: with cables attached to the hydraulic arms of four excavators, not with explosive charges.

“We’ve got the cables attached in four different locations going up. Now they’re pulling the building to the north. It’s not every day you try to pull down a eight story building with cables.”

Narrator Kevin Spacey: “The use of explosives to demolish World Trade Centers 4, 5 and 6 was rejected for fear workers would risk their lives entering buildings to set the charges.”

Why do they pull that part of the documentary out of the conspiracy story? This is yet another example of outright deception by the so called &quot;truth&quot; movement and it's leaders like Alex Jones. They draw their stories around the truth like a child drawing around their hand.
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
-- &lt;a href=&quot;http://debunking911.com/pull.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WTC 7&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dougger:</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a clue for you.  Silverstein used the term &#8220;Pull&#8221; to describe a decision made. Conspiracy theorists say &#8220;Pull&#8221; is a term used by demolition experts. This is one of those many half truths conspiracy theorists use to convince the ignorant. &#8220;Pull&#8221; is used when they &#8220;Pull&#8221; a building away from another with cables during demolition.  So, what brought down WTC7?  Most likely getting hit by the perimeter columns during the Tower Collapse and it&#8217;s eventual conflaguration.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<i><br />
“We had to be very careful about how we demolished building 6. We were worried about building 6 coming down and damaging the slurry walls, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area.” </p>
<p>Interesting. They needed to be sure that building 6 came down in a “controlled” way. But wait a second: the video clip that Alex Jones presents – the clip that’s shown on all the conspiracist websites –ends abruptly at this point. Huh? Where’s the money shot? Why’d they cut it there?</p>
<p>Here’s why:</p>
<p>Because the very next scene scene shows how building 6 was “pulled”: with cables attached to the hydraulic arms of four excavators, not with explosive charges.</p>
<p>“We’ve got the cables attached in four different locations going up. Now they’re pulling the building to the north. It’s not every day you try to pull down a eight story building with cables.”</p>
<p>Narrator Kevin Spacey: “The use of explosives to demolish World Trade Centers 4, 5 and 6 was rejected for fear workers would risk their lives entering buildings to set the charges.”</p>
<p>Why do they pull that part of the documentary out of the conspiracy story? This is yet another example of outright deception by the so called &#8220;truth&#8221; movement and it&#8217;s leaders like Alex Jones. They draw their stories around the truth like a child drawing around their hand.<br />
</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8211; <a href="http://debunking911.com/pull.htm" rel="nofollow">WTC 7</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Livermoron</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31870</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31870</guid>
					<description>Ha Ha, very funny, now claiming that it was a disingenuous remark.  So, essentially your post added nothing to the discussion except to give voice to the nut jobs on the Left.  What was the point?  Don't include me in your 'us' statement as you've already proven yoursef intellectually dishonest and a liar. I am neither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Ha, very funny, now claiming that it was a disingenuous remark.  So, essentially your post added nothing to the discussion except to give voice to the nut jobs on the Left.  What was the point?  Don&#8217;t include me in your &#8216;us&#8217; statement as you&#8217;ve already proven yoursef intellectually dishonest and a liar. I am neither.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DaveP.</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31866</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31866</guid>
					<description>Dougger... you're right. It really IS a conspiracy. All of it. 
And I'm a part. 
And you've just outed yourself to me. 

Stay where you are, Dougger. Don't try to run...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dougger&#8230; you&#8217;re right. It really IS a conspiracy. All of it.<br />
And I&#8217;m a part.<br />
And you&#8217;ve just outed yourself to me. </p>
<p>Stay where you are, Dougger. Don&#8217;t try to run&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dougger</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31863</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31863</guid>
					<description>Here is the thing:
I don't believe any of it.

Kudos to Mike and Buzz for tolerance, humor, and willingness to engage without insult.

Livermoron - you are mean spirited. That is exactly the stereotype that the &quot;progressives&quot; hang on all of us because of people like you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the thing:<br />
I don&#8217;t believe any of it.</p>
<p>Kudos to Mike and Buzz for tolerance, humor, and willingness to engage without insult.</p>
<p>Livermoron - you are mean spirited. That is exactly the stereotype that the &#8220;progressives&#8221; hang on all of us because of people like you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tully</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31862</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31862</guid>
					<description>Black helicopters! Secret UN concentration camps! Cats and dogs, living together...MASS HYSTERIA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black helicopters! Secret UN concentration camps! Cats and dogs, living together&#8230;MASS HYSTERIA!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Smaack</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31859</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31859</guid>
					<description>My mum was convinced in the last days of the Clinton Administration that Clinton was going to bring in a UN army to seize control of America and preserve himself in power.  Of course, she's nuts too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mum was convinced in the last days of the Clinton Administration that Clinton was going to bring in a UN army to seize control of America and preserve himself in power.  Of course, she&#8217;s nuts too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31858</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31858</guid>
					<description>Ok Dougger, I'll play.  What evidence do you want refuted?  Line it up.  This will, of course, be evidence that hasnt been refuted a 100 times at a 100 different sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok Dougger, I&#8217;ll play.  What evidence do you want refuted?  Line it up.  This will, of course, be evidence that hasnt been refuted a 100 times at a 100 different sites?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Livermoron</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31856</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31856</guid>
					<description>Dougger, here is ad hominem: You are a moron.  Do you actually believe that you have provided 'evidence'?  Show me it please.  Your inability to put together a cogent and cohesive argument is on display for all to see.  You know what?  Just because someone calls you stupid doesn't mean you aren't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dougger, here is ad hominem: You are a moron.  Do you actually believe that you have provided &#8216;evidence&#8217;?  Show me it please.  Your inability to put together a cogent and cohesive argument is on display for all to see.  You know what?  Just because someone calls you stupid doesn&#8217;t mean you aren&#8217;t.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dougger</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31850</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31850</guid>
					<description>So, ad hominem attacks are the order of the day.
That is usually the case when you can not refute the evidence.

It is far easier to sell a coup as a revolution by paying off the citizenry.

&quot;This government is taking pretty good care of us, no terrorist attacks here since 9-11, booming economy, lots of pork coming my way, so why not keep it?&quot;

&quot;New congress same as the old congress; Democracy has failed with these last elections; The New Bush Socialism will take care of us.&quot;

Bush doesn't have to take power, the nation is ready to give it to him. 
As planned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, ad hominem attacks are the order of the day.<br />
That is usually the case when you can not refute the evidence.</p>
<p>It is far easier to sell a coup as a revolution by paying off the citizenry.</p>
<p>&#8220;This government is taking pretty good care of us, no terrorist attacks here since 9-11, booming economy, lots of pork coming my way, so why not keep it?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;New congress same as the old congress; Democracy has failed with these last elections; The New Bush Socialism will take care of us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bush doesn&#8217;t have to take power, the nation is ready to give it to him.<br />
As planned.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Californio</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31848</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31848</guid>
					<description>Perhaps, for safety, we could move all three branches of federal government to an industrial park somewhere in Northern Virginia, Maryland or New Jersey.  Then we could throw up extensive air defenses around national treasures such as the Capital Building, Supreme Court building, White House, Smithsonian, etc.  These our national treasures which we all must take extra-ordinary steps to protect and preserve - they are irreplacable!!    As for Congress, et al, well, they are kinda, well, fungible.  Oh, and throw in a couple of extra unarmed security guards for that industrial park.

The above statements are for the purposes of humor and are not to be construed as anything other than sophmoric and juvenile. [ ha ha! my tinfoil hat  has defeated your black-helicopter beamed control waves, you secret-martial law loving, Bu$hCo Halliburton led Army-of-the-undead!!][hey, you can read my thoughts!!! Nooooooooo! Tinfoil.....hat.....defeated.....must....escape.......................................................................]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps, for safety, we could move all three branches of federal government to an industrial park somewhere in Northern Virginia, Maryland or New Jersey.  Then we could throw up extensive air defenses around national treasures such as the Capital Building, Supreme Court building, White House, Smithsonian, etc.  These our national treasures which we all must take extra-ordinary steps to protect and preserve - they are irreplacable!!    As for Congress, et al, well, they are kinda, well, fungible.  Oh, and throw in a couple of extra unarmed security guards for that industrial park.</p>
<p>The above statements are for the purposes of humor and are not to be construed as anything other than sophmoric and juvenile. [ ha ha! my tinfoil hat  has defeated your black-helicopter beamed control waves, you secret-martial law loving, Bu$hCo Halliburton led Army-of-the-undead!!][hey, you can read my thoughts!!! Nooooooooo! Tinfoil&#8230;..hat&#8230;..defeated&#8230;..must&#8230;.escape&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cincinnatus</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31847</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31847</guid>
					<description>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/video-south-park-spoofs-truther-morons/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/video-south-park-spoofs-truther-morons/' rel='nofollow'>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/video-south-park-spoofs-truther-morons/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vexorg</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31846</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31846</guid>
					<description>If I recall corectly, the prevailing conspiracy theory back when Clinton was still in office was something to the effect of handing over control of the government to the UN on some specific date in 1999, after which the UN would appoint Clinton to be the new secretary general.  As much as I hate to say it, Clinton might have actually represented an improvement in that category...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall corectly, the prevailing conspiracy theory back when Clinton was still in office was something to the effect of handing over control of the government to the UN on some specific date in 1999, after which the UN would appoint Clinton to be the new secretary general.  As much as I hate to say it, Clinton might have actually represented an improvement in that category&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Livermoron</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31842</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31842</guid>
					<description>I wonder what they breathe on Dougger's planet?  
Seriously, you have to be pretty dumb to spout that nonsense and believe it is fact.
How very sad for you Dougger.  I hope you have nothing sharper than a candle in your house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what they breathe on Dougger&#8217;s planet?<br />
Seriously, you have to be pretty dumb to spout that nonsense and believe it is fact.<br />
How very sad for you Dougger.  I hope you have nothing sharper than a candle in your house.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31834</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.extrememortman.com/white-house/a-new-martial-plan/#comment-31834</guid>
					<description>&quot;Why do I bring all this up?&quot;

Because the voices in your head told you to?  Just a guess. 

(It's probably your neighbors beaming microwaves at you.  Tinfoil, dude, tinfoil!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why do I bring all this up?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because the voices in your head told you to?  Just a guess. </p>
<p>(It&#8217;s probably your neighbors beaming microwaves at you.  Tinfoil, dude, tinfoil!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
