A Second Rate Debate — Literally
December 13, 2007 at 8:58 am
In America we believe in redemption. In politics we believe in second lives. So we’re not yet ready to declare the Des Moines Register/Iowa Public Television’s debate-hosting skills as lousy as CNN’s, because they have a chance to improve today with the Democrats.
Still, with set-ups from moderator Carolyn Washburn, editor of the Des Moines Register, like these …
- “Do you agree our country’s financial situation creates a security risk? And why or why not? We’re going to just go down the line, starting with Mayor Giuliani. And please limit your answers on this to 30 seconds.”
- “We do need to stay at 30 seconds. This is not the time to get behind.”
- “I want to dig into the budget issue a little bit more. You’ll have 30 seconds to answer this next question.”
- “15 seconds or so: Who in this country is paying more than a fair share of taxes relative to everyone else — the wealthy, the middle class, the poor or corporations?”
- “I will offer up to 30 seconds of rebuttal time for any candidate criticized by name.”
- “Periodically throughout the debate we’ll give each of the candidates 30 seconds to make a free statement.”
- “Want to come back to some issues that affect the economy. You’ll have 30 seconds again. The longer you go on, the shorter we’ll have to go. Thirty seconds to answer these questions.”
- “I need you to keep your remarks to 30 seconds.”
- “We’re going to talk about New Year’s resolutions. You have 15 seconds.”
… we don’t hold out much hope. Will they do better today? We’ll set the Jack Bauer stopwatch right now and say you have one second to answer. And no shows of hands. Just feet.




























